Author Norman Ohler Reveals How the Nazi's Started Using Meth

Introduction

This tutorial provides an overview of how methamphetamine, specifically Pervitin, became prevalent in Nazi Germany and its utilization by the military and society. Norman Ohler's insights reveal the historical context of drug use during the Nazi regime, highlighting its impact on soldiers and civilians alike.

Step 1: Understanding the Origins of Methamphetamine

• Methamphetamine was first synthesized by a Japanese chemist, Nagi, in 1917.
• Theodor TLA, head of the TLA Factory, aimed to create a superior amphetamine after witnessing American athlete Jesse Owens outperform German athletes at the 1936 Berlin Olympics.
• In October 1937, TLA patented a new method for synthesizing methamphetamine, leading to the drug’s market release in 1938.
• Pervitin was marketed as a medicine without prescription requirements, making it widely accessible.

Step 2: Societal Adoption of Pervitin

• In late 1930s Germany, there was no stigma associated with methamphetamine; it was embraced as a performance-enhancing substance.
• Workers used Pervitin to boost productivity in factories where coffee was scarce.
• It gained popularity among party-goers for its ego-boosting effects, and it was believed to alleviate depression and increase sexual drive.
• University studies at the time claimed that methamphetamine had positive effects, overlooking potential addiction risks.

Step 3: Military Utilization of Methamphetamine

• Professor Ranka, head of the German Army's Institute for Defense Physiology, researched ways to combat fatigue, recognizing it as the primary enemy of soldiers.
• Ranka conducted tests using Pervitin to determine its effectiveness in keeping soldiers awake and alert during extended operations.
• Results showed that soldiers on methamphetamine could sustain activity longer, making it attractive for military use, especially during the Blitzkrieg tactics.

Step 4: Research Findings and Implications

• Ranka's tests revealed that while Pervitin kept soldiers awake, it impaired their ability to solve complex problems.
• The drug was effective in enhancing short-term performance, but the decrease in cognitive function was a significant downside.
• Soldiers were able to follow commands effectively, making them compliant in combat situations.

Conclusion

The rise of Pervitin in Nazi Germany illustrates a complex intersection between drug use, societal pressures, and military strategy. Understanding this historical context provides insight into the implications of performance-enhancing substances, both in wartime and in civilian life. For those interested in further exploration, consider researching the long-term effects of methamphetamine addiction or the ethical implications of drug use in military settings.