ARK 2 MISTAKE! Removed From Gamescom? New Abberation Pay To Win DLC Creature "Cosmo" A Stolen Idea?

Introduction

This tutorial delves into the recent developments surrounding ARK 2, including the controversy surrounding the new creature "Cosmo," its potential pay-to-win implications, and the game's absence from Gamescom. We'll explore these issues and provide insights on what they mean for the ARK community and players.

Step 1: Understanding the Cosmo Creature

• Cosmo has been introduced as part of a new DLC and is expected to include unique abilities such as:
  • Grappling with a hook.
  • Using a bowler.
• There are allegations that the design of Cosmo closely resembles a previously submitted creature concept called Mava Eureka, raising ethical questions about creativity and credit in game development.

Step 2: Examining Gamescom Absence

• ARK 2 was initially listed as having a playable demo at Gamescom, scheduled for August 22-24.
• This mention was later removed, leading to speculation about the game's presence at the event.
• While there may not be a playable demo, it is still possible that a new trailer or gameplay footage will be revealed.

Step 3: Analyzing Community Concerns

• The community has expressed frustration over the perceived lack of transparency from the developers, Wildcard.
• Many players are skeptical about the timeline and the game's potential release, especially given the delay in the 2023 launch window.
• It's crucial to recognize that games often need a full gameplay reveal months before their release, and the absence of such information raises concerns about delays.

Step 4: Financial Implications for Wildcard

• The financial health of Wildcard and its parent company, Snail Games, is currently in jeopardy.
• The company needs to raise its stock price or face potential delisting, leading to significant consequences.
• This financial pressure may impact the development timeline for ARK 2, with the possibility of a surprise release if the game is ready.

Step 5: The Debate on Game Ethics

• The introduction of Cosmo raises ethical questions about developers using fan ideas for profit without proper recognition.
• The community is divided on whether this practice is acceptable, with many arguing that developers should credit original creators or compensate them for their work.
• This situation highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing creativity and originality in game development.

Conclusion

The developments surrounding ARK 2 and the introduction of the Cosmo creature present significant concerns for the community. Players are urged to stay informed about potential announcements at Gamescom and continue discussions about the ethical implications of game design. As the situation evolves, fans of ARK should remain engaged and vocal about their expectations for transparency and integrity in the game's development.