WATCH: Wisconsin Supreme Court debate

Introduction

This tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of the Wisconsin Supreme Court debate featuring Susan Crawford and Brad Schimel. As this debate is crucial for voters ahead of the April 1 election, this guide will summarize key points discussed during the debate, helping you to understand the candidates' positions and the issues at stake.

Step 1: Understand the Candidates' Backgrounds

• Susan Crawford: Research her professional background, focusing on her previous roles, legal expertise, and political affiliations.
• Brad Schimel: Investigate his history, including past positions held, legal accomplishments, and his stance on key issues.

Step 2: Key Issues Addressed in the Debate

• Judicial Philosophy: Examine how each candidate approaches judicial interpretation and their views on the role of the Supreme Court.
• Criminal Justice Reform: Identify their positions on criminal justice, including sentencing reform and the handling of non-violent offenses.
• Voting Rights: Note their stances on voting access and election integrity, highlighting any proposed changes or laws they support.

Step 3: Analyze Candidates' Arguments and Counterarguments

• Crawford's Main Arguments: List her key points and how she supports her views, including any data or case studies she references.
• Schimel's Main Arguments: Outline his main points, focusing on his rationale and any statistics or personal anecdotes used to bolster his claims.
• Rebuttals: Summarize how each candidate responds to the other's points during the debate.

Step 4: Take Note of Voter Questions and Responses

• Audience Engagement: Highlight any significant questions posed by voters and how each candidate addressed them.
• Relevance of Questions: Discuss the importance of these questions in relation to current issues facing Wisconsin residents.

Step 5: Evaluate the Debate's Impact

• Public Reception: Consider how the debate was received by the public and media. Look for post-debate analyses or polls indicating shifts in voter sentiment.
• Follow-Up Actions: Encourage viewers to stay informed by watching debates, reading news articles, and engaging with candidate platforms.

Conclusion

The Wisconsin Supreme Court debate between Susan Crawford and Brad Schimel provided valuable insights into the candidates' positions on critical issues. Understanding their backgrounds, key arguments, and the questions from voters is essential for making an informed decision in the upcoming election. Stay engaged with the electoral process by continuing to research and discuss the candidates and their policies.