[KDMI 2022] Grand Final - UMSU vs ULM vs UNAIR vs UGM

Introduction

This tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of the Grand Final of the 2022 Indonesian Student Debate Competition (KDMI). It highlights the arguments presented by the participating universities, the debate topic regarding cultural subversion, and the implications for society. This guide is valuable for students and debaters looking to understand the dynamics of competitive debating and cultural discourse.

Step 1: Understand the Debate Topic

The debate centers around the motion: "This council regrets the trend of urban cultural subversion." Here's how to grasp the concept:

• Cultural Subversion Definition: It refers to actions that challenge and undermine dominant power structures, particularly those associated with the upper middle class.
• Context: The affluent class often showcases luxury and an exclusive lifestyle, which can alienate lower socioeconomic groups.
• Implications: Recognize how this tension creates a platform for cultural resistance from lower classes seeking expression and identity.

Step 2: Identify Key Arguments

Each participating university presents unique arguments reflecting their stance on the motion. Key points include:

• Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara (UMSU): Focus on the benefits and dangers of cultural expression from lower classes.
• Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (ULM): Emphasize the need for inclusivity in cultural representation.
• Universitas Airlangga (UNAIR): Discuss the negative impacts of elitism in culture.
• Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM): Argue for the significance of recognizing and supporting emerging subcultures.

Step 3: Analyze Cultural Examples

The debate also references specific cultural phenomena that illustrate the concept of subversion:

• Citayem Fashion Week: A grassroots fashion movement that challenges conventional beauty standards.
• Punk Groups: Represent rebellion against societal norms and elitism through music and lifestyle.
• Harajuku Style: A Japanese fashion subculture known for its vibrant and eclectic styles, which often defy mainstream trends.

Step 4: Engage with the Debate Format

Understanding the structure of a debate is crucial to following along:

• Opening Statements: Each team presents their case.
• Rebuttals: Teams respond to the opposing arguments.
• Cross-Examination: Teams question each other to clarify points and challenge assertions.
• Closing Statements: A final summary of each team’s position.

Step 5: Reflect on Cultural Impact

Consider the broader implications of cultural subversion:

• Social Movements: How cultural expressions can lead to social change.
• Identity Formation: The role of culture in shaping individual and collective identities.
• Cultural Appreciation vs. Appropriation: Understanding the fine line between celebrating and exploiting cultural differences.

Conclusion

The Grand Final of the KDMI 2022 provided a thought-provoking exploration of urban cultural subversion and its implications for society. By understanding the debate topic, key arguments, relevant cultural examples, and the format of competitive debating, participants and observers can better engage with the complexities of cultural discourse. For further exploration, consider following more debates, joining discussion groups, or researching specific movements referenced in the debate.